Writing promotes philosophy? Writing is philosophy!

Writers are the best philosophers because they have a vast vocabulary and they have a broad knowledge of multiple subjects instead of narrowing on a particular. They have a very peculiar outlook on life and no matter what the situation or subject is they DO UNDERSTAND but they see it in a way that others do not. Sometimes I feel like I'm smarter than the average bear if they don't see it through my eyes. This is the opinion of a writer. Myself.

I consider those who reach beyond their expertise and reach beyond their limits on parchment are indeed philosophers. I just happen to be one of them. I take on the world like any other woman and like any person, who has just graduated college, I'm trying to make a name for herself in the world. But I have already made a name for myself. Not on a trophy or an award per say but on this piece of electronic parchment and the other pieces of parchment I have written on, published, or in case typed.

My name, a person's name, or even a fictional being can be made without any significant events. I sign my name on papers and applications all the time and every time I can tell it is not the same 

as the signature before. A good analogy to this is that my writing or focus of writing is always different. I could write a thriller story about a mysterious murder and then other times just rant on like a lunatic whose had too much booze to swallow. But I guess that is how you stand out from others in society. You have to be that lunatic. I am that lunatic. Never in a million years would I say that I am a lunatic but when it comes to writing passionately about things that no one else understands I might as well have a mental illness.

Now don't think that just because I said I am a lunatic that I am one or that any writer is psycho crazy. We each have our viewpoints and we want to grasp an audience that shares our viewpoints and will hopefully share them with the world. Most people think we have irrational minds or that we don't read the lines. Actually we do read the lines but we sometimes sneak in some statements that come from between the lines too so that the person we are talking to or the topic we are discussing has a joint standard. The joint standard simply means that the argument or declaration we are making has more than one attitude and it becomes the reader's decision on where it leads. Though not all writers provide the opportunity of joint standard to peek out in their writings we are open to other's opinions and we accept their feedback as their own philosophies. Capital idea to respect another's writing, isn't it?

For my writing personally I accept compliments and criticism no matter how angelic or vulgar. I respect all opinions from all walks of life and it never seizes to amaze me the multiple viewpoints society has. Though I may not agree with all of them and I cannot clearly see the vison I do try and get a grasp on them and get a better explanation or thought process. By keeping the open mind, I do become inspired by the multiple comments and the multiple possibilities around me to think outside the box. As I've said throughout college and as I'm saying now writers are philosophers and being a writer you have to accept that there is no finish line. If you set a finish line you won't get much of anywhere. If no line is drawn then the universe is yours.